NJ NY Affordable Web Design Personal and Business Website SEO Computer Repair Virus Removal Bogota Bergen County NJ
  • Home
  • Prices and Services
  • Make a Payment
  • Contact David
  • Blog
Google Buzz 02/16/2010
5 Comments
 
What is your opinion on Googles new Buzz.  Is this another attack at our privacy by Google?
 


Comments

Amir link
02/18/2010 12:49am

Just wanted to say that Dave had set up our site and after talking to various companies and their programs and prices I had found him extreemly reasonable, professional, accurate.
he stayed with us all the way which other companies I had to wait for someone to return my call even before we gave them the business. But dave was there when we needed him.
Thank you Dave. you are the best

Reply
Jake C.
02/22/2010 4:12pm

I think Google does invade our privacy in the fact that they save EVERYTHING! But I am still excited about the upcoming Google OS

Reply
Christopher
02/26/2010 9:23pm

I haven't had the the opportunity to give Google Buzz a full trial enough to voice a great review about it quite yet so watch this post as I will be checking it out soon in better detail. The main premise of this post is a little off topic but I though I would give a few cents into the blog now because I saw the word 'attack' being used to descibe the new Buzz platform. First of all, just as all the other major p2p and social network sights have been blamed for ATTACKING our privacy, I just have a glitch in my mind about people using this word ATTACK so loosely. Its always seemed to bother me for some reason. It seems to be the media taking advantage of the word to get the readers attention.
Ive seen it used frequently in the area I live. I'm an avid surfer living in Cocoa Beach, Florida. Home to 11 time world champion surfer Kelly Slater and a whole slew of other pro surfers and the town is great. Just a huge surfing mecca. Well my point is that obviously we share the ocean that we play in with an animal called a shark. So, quite often in the summer, their are several shark ATTACKS. I cant help but laugh when the papers use this word. They are not attacks at all. Their simple bights that were mistaken for something to eat. At least the sharks I'm familiar with do not attack. They bite.
Get my point? These social networks may collect info and various other things I couldn't speak intelligently enough about but I don't need to. I certainly do know that they are not ATTACKS.
Attacks implies taking the initiative in a struggle. We all know the meaning but certainly in my opinion the word is WAY over used to get people going. Maybe I'm wrong. If ssomeone wants to correct me on this than please do. Like I said before, I'm not educated enough to know exactly why Google or any other powerful web based social networking platform would ATTACK anyonee?
But just in case Ive secured myself with a defense system. Lots of beer and Xanax for all the fear this attack has caused me. Thanks for the BUZZ Google!

Reply
June
02/26/2010 9:30pm

Christopher has an excellent point. Hey, this could be a great blog topic!

NICE WEBSITE BTW. ATTACK!!!!! ATTACK!!!!

Reply
get alexa traffic link
04/13/2012 8:37am

Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts

Reply



Leave a Reply

    Click on the Title of Blog to Post or View Comments.

    Archives

    February 2012
    August 2010
    July 2010
    February 2010

    Click to set custom HTML
    WARNING: Google Buzz Has A Huge Privacy Flaw   1/11       Nicholas Carlson | Feb. 10, 2010, 4:49 PM  Update 3: Here's the story of how panicking just enough may have saved Google's answer to Facebook and Twitter.

    Update 2: Google has made further changes that address most -- but not all -- of our concerns.

    Update 1: Google released some privacy fixes for Buzz. They're a nice start, but we don't think they go far enough. Read more here: Sorry, Google's Improvements To Buzz Don't Fix Privacy Flaw

    Earlier: There is a huge privacy flaw in Google's new Twitter/Facebook competitor, Google Buzz.

    When you first go into Google Buzz, it automatically sets you up with followers and people to follow.

    A Google spokesperson tells us these people are chosen based on whom the users emails and chats with most using Gmail.

    That's fine.

    The problem is that -- by default -- the people you follow and the people that follow you are made public to anyone who looks at your profile.

    In other words, before you change any settings in Google Buzz, someone could go into your profile and see the people you email and chat with most.

    A Google spokesperson asked us to phrase this claim differently. Like this: "In other words, after you create your profile in Buzz, if you don't edit any of the default settings, someone could visit your profile and see the people you email and chat with most (provided you didn't edit this list during profile creation)."

    (Freaking out already? Here's how to IMMEDIATELY make these list private and then edit them >)

    When you first post to Google Buzz, there is a dialogue box that reads "Before participating in Buzz, you need a public profile with your name and photo." It also says -- albeit in tiny gray letters against a white background, "Your profile includes your name, photo, people you follow, and people who follow you."

    But it does not say that these publicly viewable follower lists are made up of people you most frequently email and chat with.

    Even if it did say that, we doubt most users bother to read the text in the dialogue box before clicking "save profile and continue."

    (This is why it's always safest for Web services providers to make it so sharing information is always an "opt-in," rather than "opt-out," setting. Just ask Facebook, which still remembers Beacon.)

    There is also a "Welcome To Buzz" panel that shows who you are following and who is following you. In a long bit of unbolded text, it says "Buzz is a new way to share updates, photos, videos and more, and start conversations about the things you find interesting. You're already set up to follow the people you email and chat with the most."

     If a user notices the box, it might help users "catch" that they might be following people they don't want the world to know they're following. But you don't have to close the box to use Buzz. Closing the box does not trigger a warning or anything else that alerts the user they've agreed to publish a list of the people they email and chat with most.

    It looks like this:

    The whole point is: Google should just ask users: "Do you want to follow these people we've suggested you follow based on the fact that you email and chat with them? Warning: This will expose to the public who you email and chat with most."  Google should not let users proceed to using Buzz until they click, "Yes, publish these lists."

    In my profession -- where anonymous sourcing is a crucial tool -- the implications of this flaw are terrifying.

    But it's bad for others too. Two obvious scenarios come to mind:

    • Imagine if a wife discovering that her husband emails and chats with an old girlfriend a ton.
    • Imagine a boss discovers a subordinate emails with executives at a competitor.
    A Google spokesperson tells us the followers lists are public by default so that people can quickly find new people to follow. Obviously, that's a good thing for Google, which is hoping to get as many people using Google Buzz as soon as possible. It's also meant to be helpful for users. And for those who are unconcerned with telling the world who they email most, it is. But for everyone else, it's terrible.

    It gets to a deeper problem with Google Buzz: It's built on email, which is a very different Internet application than a social network.

    The good news for Google is that this is a very easy problem to fix. Google must either shut off auto-following, or it must make follower lists private by default as soon as possible.

    RSS Feed